Evaluating and Ranking Supply Chain Distributors Using FAHP and FANP Methods

Authors

  • Mehdi Kianiha * Department of Industrial Engineering, Mechanics and Aerospace, Buin Zahra Technical and Engineering Higher Education Center, Qazvin, Iran.
  • Masoud Rahiminezhad Golankeshi Department of Industrial Engineering, Mechanics and Aerospace, Buin Zahra Technical and Engineering Higher Education Center, Qazvin, Iran.
  • Roghieh Bazoubandi Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48313/scodm.v2i4.48

Abstract

The current trend of the global market highlights the necessity of establishing long-term relationships between organizations and global distributors worldwide. The selection of unknown international distributors represents a highly critical multi-criteria decision-making problem for organizations. With the increasing importance of purchasing and procurement activities, purchasing decisions have become more crucial. Moreover, as organizations have become increasingly dependent on distributors, the direct and indirect consequences of poor decision-making have become more severe. In most industries, the cost of raw materials and product components constitutes a major portion of the total product cost. In this study, after reviewing previous research in the field of supply chain management, the selection of a distribution network from among available distributor alternatives is addressed. To this end, relevant scientific articles and books were first reviewed, and based on the research literature, critical and influential factors for achieving effective supply chain management were identified. Subsequently, by consulting experts from the relevant company, the desired and important factors specific to the company were determined. The identified criteria were then weighted using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP). Finally, using these methods, the best distribution network was selected.

Keywords:

Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Fuzzy analytic network process, Supply chain, Distribution network

References

  1. [1] Ghasemi, P., Ali, S. M., Abolghasemian, M., Malakoot, R. A., & Chobar, A. P. (2025). A stochastic sustainable closed-loop supply chain networks for used solar photovoltaic systems: Meta-heuristic comparison and real case study. Sustainable operations and computers, 6, 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2024.11.001

  2. [2] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Locating routing problem (LRP) of distribution of priority support items to ground forces in war conditions. Engineering management and soft computing, 10(1), 262–292. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22091/jemsc.2024.11320.1206

  3. [3] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Modeling the positioning of support forces in future battles using data envelopment analysis and the principles of natural and managerial accessibility. Defensive future studies, 9(32), 65-98. https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2024.2007554.1720

  4. [4] Sorourkhah, A., Azar, A., Babaie-Kafaki, S., & Shafiei Nik Abadi, M. (2017). Using weighted-robustness analysis in strategy selection (Case study: Saipa automotive research and innovation center). Industrial management journal, 9(4), 665-690. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/imj.2018.247856.1007361

  5. [5] Montazeri, F. Z., Sorourkhah, A., Marinković, D., & Lukovac, V. (2024). Robust-fuzzy-probabilistic optimization for a resilient, sustainable supply chain with an inventory management approach by the seller. Big data and computing visions, 4(2), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2024.481945.1208

  6. [6] Abolghasemian, M., Kaveh, S., & Ebrahimzadeh, F. (2025). Simulation-based optimization: A comprehensive review of concept, method and its application. Research annals of industrial and systems engineering, 2(3), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.vi.76

  7. [7] Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing, 2(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x

  8. [8] Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2002). A multi‐criteria group decisionmaking model for supplier rating. Journal of supply chain management, 38(3), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00140.x

  9. [9] Humphreys, P. K., Wong, Y. K., & Chan, F. T. S. (2003). Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of materials processing technology, 138(1-3), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00097-9

  10. [10] Choy, K. L., Lee, W. B., Lau, H. C., & Choy, L. C. (2005). A knowledge-based supplier intelligence retrieval system for outsource manufacturing. Knowledge-based systems, 18(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2004.05.003

  11. [11] Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2003). Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 9(4), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00032-3

  12. [12] Wang, G., Huang, S. H., & Dismukes, J. P. (2004). Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International journal of production economics, 91(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00221-4

  13. [13] Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., & Roodhooft, F. (2004). Total cost of ownership purchasing of a service: The case of airline selection at Alcatel Bell. European journal of operational research, 156(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.002

  14. [14] Bharadwaj, N. (2004). Investigating the decision criteria used in electronic components procurement. Industrial marketing management, 33(4), 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00081-6

  15. [15] Lin, C., Chow, W. S., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H., & Yu, P. P. (2005). A structural equation model of supply chain quality management and organizational performance. International journal of production economics, 96(3), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.05.009

  16. [16] Liu, F. H. F., & Hai, H. L. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International journal of production economics, 97(3), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005

  17. [17] Araz, C., Ozfirat, P. M., & Ozkarahan, I. (2007). An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management. Computers & operations research, 34(12), 3738-3756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.014

  18. [18] Shyur, H. J., & Shih, H. S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and computer modelling, 44(7-8), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018

  19. [19] Chan, F. T. S., Chan, H. K., Ip, R. W. L., & Lau, H. C. W. (2007). A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part B: Journal of engineering manufacture, 221(4), 741-758. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM629

  20. [20] Hou, J., & Su, D. (2007). EJB‐MVC oriented supplier selection system for mass customization. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 18(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710717643

  21. [21] Ha, S. H., & Krishnan, R. (2008). A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert systems with applications, 34(2), 1303-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.12.008

  22. [22] Mendoza, A., & Ventura, J. A. (2008). An effective method to supplier selection and order quantity allocation. International journal of business and systems research, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2008.018117

  23. [23] Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European journal of operational research, 202(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009

  24. [24] Samieifard, M., Abolghasemian, M., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2024). The impact of innovation, performance, and e-commerce development in the online shop on online marketing: A case study in the industry. Interdisciplinary journal of management studies, 18(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2024.358619.675818

  25. [25] Hemmati, A., Kaveh, F., Abolghasemian, M., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2024). Simulating the line balance to provide an improvement plan for optimal production and costing in petrochemical industries. Engineering management and soft computing, 10(1), 190–212. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22091/jemsc.2024.11189.1198

  26. [26] Saaty, T. L. (2013). The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations research, 61(5), 1101-1118. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1197

  27. [27] Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decisions with the analytic network process (ANP). University of pittsburgh (USA), ISAHP, 96. http://www.isahp.org/uploads/1-decisions.pdf

  28. [28] Önüt, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste management, 28(9), 1552-1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019

  29. [29] Chen, S. M. (1993). Representing fuzzy knowledge using extended fuzzy Petri nets. In 1993 (2nd) international symposium on uncertainty modeling and analysis (pp. 339-346). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1993.366746

  30. [30] Ramik, J., & Perzina, R. (2006). Fuzzy ANP–a new method and case study. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference mathematical methods in economics 2006 (pp. 433-445). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2024.11.001

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Kianiha, M. ., Rahiminezhad Golankeshi, M. ., & Bazoubandi, R. . (2025). Evaluating and Ranking Supply Chain Distributors Using FAHP and FANP Methods. Supply Chain and Operations Decision Making, 2(4), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.48313/scodm.v2i4.48

Similar Articles

1-10 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.